|
new zeeland
new zeeland - individual
motivation is the conceptual point of departure and the driving force
for this transformation of the coastline into a beautiful oceanscape -
as a strategy not a design - let's say Susie Blitz is looking for a place
to build their own house with Robert Rodenrys - they have the choice between
actively supporting the urban sprawl or live the concept of density still
rarely attractive - in any case many rules apply and the terrain for self
initiative is not existing - in new zeeland Susie and Robert pay only
for the infrastrucural piece (steet+site) onto which they will build their
individual house - it will be less expensive than in most areas of the
randstad - additionally they get the right to market the next site - they
actually make money off that - last but not least the oceanscape in front
of their house belongs to them - they are free to attach gardens or boat
dockings to it within a set parameter - actually the development of the
fingers is supervised only in security and infrastructural aspects - no
architectural rules apply - potential stretches of oceanfront for these
developments are advertised nationally and as soon as some clients sign
in for a particular site devellopment begins - within 1 year after signing
the infrastructure is built - some projects will grow faster than others
- over time fingers extend into the ocean - some of the ocean pockets
framed by two fingers will be filled creating public infrastructures (educational
facilities, spaces for sports and recreational parks) - the tradition
of classic land reclamation is turned into a linear strategy of a larger
scale - orthogonal to the coast like an inverse zeeland - amfibisch pioneers
going west
|